
 |
|
|
 |
 |
- Biography
- Representative Matters
- News
- Presentations
- Awards and Recognitions
- Alerts
BiographyI began my legal career with Fulbright & Jaworski in 1977. Soon after my first jury trial, I realized I had a grand passion for litigation - the diversity of personalities, events, and legal principles fascinated me. In 1980, I started my own practice, the firm that evolved into Franklin, Cardwell & Jones, of which I was managing shareholder.
A short time ago, I learned a powerful lesson about the value of community. I had always known that the practice of law was a "service" profession, but I was dramatically shown the importance of community and, in the process, where clients fit into that dynamic. Needless to say, I have come to cherish all that I can do for my clients - whom I consider my friends and an important part of my own community - when they become involved in legal entanglements. My focus, in short, is to determine how I can help.
I joined BoyarMiller as Chairman of the Litigation Group in 2010. The firm's attorneys and I share a loyal sense of community, a mission of integrity and transparency, and above all, a dedicated focus to helping our clients.
In August 2011, I was invited and had the privilege to present a CLE program on Trade Secrets and Electronic Discovery with BoyarMiller Litigation Senior Associate Craig Dillard to the Harris County District Court Judges at the annual Harris County Civil Judicial CLE program.
Representative Matters
- Represented the putative partner in a company operating in the Barnett Shale gas play of North Texas against a large Canadian public company that acquired the operating company and schemed to cut out the clients' ownership interest. The case was filed in Wise County, Texas, and was settled for $14 million on the eve of trial.
- Defended a suit by putative royalty owners against an oil and gas operating company for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract related to mineral leases for horizontal drilling rights in the Austin Chalk in Central Texas. After a trial to a jury in Fayette County, Texas, a take nothing judgment was entered in favor of the defendants.
- Represented plaintiffs in a shareholders' derivative claim against a company providing long term acute (LTAC) medical care, its lender and officers of the LTAC, who were also affiliated with the lender. Plaintiffs were founding shareholders and chief executives of the company, which had grown from zero revenues at start-up, to revenues in excess of $300 million. The case settled for in excess of $50 million.
Education
- JD, St. Mary's University School of Law
- MBA, University of Texas
- Southern Methodist University
Licensed In
- Texas
- Colorado
- Mississippi
Affiliations
Community
- Julia C. Hester House Board of Directors
- American Leadership Forum Class of 2010-11
- St. Luke's United Methodist Church, Board of Stewards and Adult Sunday School Leader
- Steering Commitee - Young Life Greater Houston Region
|
|
 |
Representative Matters
- Represented a Vancouver, British Columbia venture capital company that entered into a written reverse merger agreement between a publicly-held company and with a Texas emergency room physician group that utilized telecommunications for remote operations of rural emergency rooms. The client contracted with a national, big-four accounting firm to conduct due diligence for the to-be-formed public company, as required of the CDNX. The accountant assigned to the engagement subsequently began an affair with the daughter of the president of the physicians' group and then convinced the president that he could negotiate a better deal for the group than the pending deal with accountant's client. After suit was filed against the physicians' group and accounting firm, the case was settled on confidential terms at mediation just before trial.
- Successfully defended an oil and gas exploration and production company and one of its employees in a suit filed by the employee's former employer related to a claim that the employee misappropriated confidential proprietary data that was downloaded from the employee's laptop computer owned and provided by the employer. The plaintiff alleged the down-loaded information provided the informational basis for a $750 million offer by the defendant to purchase properties identified in the downloaded data. At the hearing for temporary restraining order, the defendants produced to the court a thumb drive on which all of the allegedly misappropriated data had been downloaded, along with a representation that all of the data had been removed from defendants' computers, which the plaintiff could verify by inspections of the computer hard drives by plaintiff's IT expert. The court concluded this was not the usual spoliation case because the employer had specifically asked for the return of its confidential information and for prevention of access to the information by anyone at the new employer. Also, due to delivery of the thumb drive to the court and plaintiff, the deleted information remained in existence and in plaintiff's hands. After the results of the forensic examination were reported, the court denied plaintiff's request for injunctive relief or sanctions because no bad faith had been shown.
- Represented a minority shareholder plaintiff in a suit against the controlling shareholder based on the controlling shareholder's refusal to distribute proceeds from the sale of the company. After two appeals to the Texas Supreme Court and eleven years after being filed, the case settled during a jury trial when the controlling shareholder agreed to distribute all of the withheld sales proceeds. The impetus for settlement occurred when the trial court re-administered the oath to the defendant midway through his cross examination after he had been caught repeatedly misrepresenting facts that had been undisputedly established by the companies own books and records, including minutes of directors meetings.
- Represented a class of employees against management of a refining company in an ERISA case filed after the plaintiff class had agreed to wage cuts based on management's promise that the company would become an "employee owned" upon acquisition of the company from its previous owners. In fact, only management became owners. The case settled for $140 million.
- Represented 10,000 cattle investors in a class action suit against a big-four public accounting firm for tax accounting malpractice. The accounting firm had approved and filed tax returns that claimed over $35 million in deductions for grazing land without any support or proof that the land was actually being used for that purpose. After a trial in which the jury awarded over $77 million in punitive damages, the court entered judgment in favor of the class for a total of $100 million.
|
|
 |
PresentationsTrade Secrets and Electronic Discovery by Greg Jones and Craig Dillard Annual Harris County Civil Judicial CLE Program August 8, 2011
|
|
 |
Awards and Recognitions
- Selected for inclusion in Texas Super Lawyers (2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003)
- Martindale Hubbell — AV Peer Rated
|
|
 |
Alerts
In 2003, mostly in response to publicity related to global warming, the world was abuzz with expectations for new nuclear power plants given that nuclear power plants release no greenhouse gases. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology issued a study entitled The Future of Nuclear Power: an Interdisciplinary Study which influenced emerging rapidly-growing economies, such as China, India, Korea and Russia, to build new nuclear power plants. Highly developed economies, such as France, which currently has 75% of its electricity generated from nuclear generators, and the U.S., which has 104 existing nuclear plants, announced plans to add dozens of new nuclear power plants in order to significantly reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. But something happened along the way.
In March 2011, a tsunami hit Fukushima, Japan utterly destroying one of Japan’s nuclear power plants and causing rising angst about the release of radioactive material as a result of the slams by the 45+foot tsunami. Combined with the tsunami was another storm, figuratively speaking; namely, the fracking of oil and gas shale. This new drilling technology has produced huge volumes of natural gas in the U.S. which has resulted in the lowest price per million BTU’s in decades -- below $2.00, which means that the production of a kilowatt-hour of electricity is less than 2 cents. The U.S. is even liquefying natural gas and exporting it because of storage incapacity. Natural gas reduces greenhouse gases about 40% when used in the production of electricity, particularly when compared to coal-fired plants. As a result of the new low prices of natural gas combined with the Fukushima scare, natural gas is the new rage being touted for the clean production of energy, from electrical power plants to fuel for trucks, buses and other larger vehicles. The combination of a real storm and a drill/production storm has cooled the passion for the development of new nuclear power plants.
But nuclear power development has not stopped. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission recently issued approval for the construction of two pairs of reactors in Georgia and South Carolina, which will use new, advanced technology developed by Westinghouse, an energy company 81% owned by the Toshiba Group.
Also interesting, private enterprise entities are focused on nuclear power. Alternate Energy Holdings, Inc., the nation’s only independent nuclear power plant developer and a current client of BoyarMiller, recently announced the completion of initial site improvements and its agreement with ENERCON, a U.S. industry leader utilizing the 10CFR Part 52 Combined Operating License Application Process, to license and build the Idaho Energy Complex, a nuclear plant in Payette County, Idaho.
Global warming or not, clean energy is here to stay.
|
|
 |

|
|
|