Shareholder, Litigation Group Chair
Andrew Pearce began with BoyarMiller’s Litigation Group in September 2007 after clerking at the firm during law school. Since joining the firm, he has represented both individuals and corporations in all types of commercial and business litigation. In all endeavors, Andrew strives to embody the mission of BoyarMiller: to provide counsel beyond expectations, build lasting relationships and make a meaningful difference in people’s lives.
Areas of Focus
- General commercial litigation
- Employment disputes
- Corporate business disputes
- Texas Bar Foundation Fellow
- Houston Young Lawyers Association Foundation Fellow
Awards & Recognitions
- Texas Super Lawyers (2020)
- Houstonia Magazine's Top Lawyer (2017-2020)
- Texas Super Lawyers Rising Stars (2013-2017)
- HBA President's Award recipient (2012)
- Dean's Award for Outstanding Student Advocate
- The Student Bar Association's Award for Outstanding Male Graduate
Andrew Pearce began with BoyarMiller's Litigation Group in September 2007 after clerking at the firm during law school. Since joining the firm, he has represented both individuals and corporations in all types of commercial and business litigation. In all endeavors, Andrew strives to embody the mission of BoyarMiller: to provide counsel beyond expectations, build lasting relationships and make a meaningful difference in people's lives.
While at South Texas, Andrew received the Dean's Award for Outstanding Student Advocate, the Student Bar Association's Award for Outstanding Male Graduate, and election into the National Order of Barristers. He was chairman of the Board of Advocates, a member of Law Review, and represented South Texas College of Law Houston's nationally recognized advocacy program at six varsity competitions.
- JD, South Texas College of Law Houston
- South Texas Law Review, Member
- The Order of Barristers
- BJour, University of Texas
- Texas Bar Foundation Fellow
- Houston Young Lawyers Association Foundation Fellow
- Houston Bar Association
- Texas Bar Association
- American Bar Association
- HBA Houston Lawyer Committee (2018-2019), Associate Editor (2020)
- South Texas College of Law Houston Alumni Association Board of Directors (2019-2020)
- HBA Continuing Legal Education Committee (2018-2019)
- HBA Litigation Section Chair (2018-2019)
- HBA 2019 Civil/Appellate Bench Bar Conference Committee Member
- HBA Litigation Section Chair Elect (2017-2018)
- HBA Litigation Section Treasurer (2016-2017)
- HBA John J. Eikenburg Law Week Fun Run Co-Chair (2012-2013) and Committee Member (2010-2017)
- HBA Habitat for Humanity Committee Member (2013-2014)
- South Texas College of Law Houston Varsity Moot Court Program, Advocacy Adjunct
Successfully obtained voluntary dismissal with prejudice from plaintiffs after filing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of two startup companies defending a lawsuit for tortious interference, aiding and abetting torts, breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation, and unfair competition
Successfully represented a national accounting firm against claims brought by a departing partner. Successfully obtained a summary judgment ruling in arbitration that disposed of the departing partner’s largest claim. Following a hearing, the departing partner’s remaining claims were denied in their entirety and our client was awarded recovery of all attorneys’ fees and arbitration fees incurred in the matter.
Pursued claims on behalf of a developer for breach of a contract following its attempt to purchase a piece of real estate. The client executed an agreement to purchase the property with an agent for the seller, but was then informed that the property’s tenant had exercised its right of first refusal to purchase the property. Our client subsequently learned that the seller backed out of the sale with the tenant and our client sought to enforce its original purchase agreement. The seller argued that the agent who brokered the deal did not have authority to execute the agreement with our client. The parties settled the lawsuit on favorable terms to our client.
Obtained judgment of more than $9 million on behalf of entrepreneurs related to the sale of their valve company to a New York-based private equity firm. After the sale, the buyer asserted indemnification claims against the entrepreneurs based on pre-sale representations allegedly made by the entrepreneurs. In doing so, the buyer sought to avoid paying the bulk of the purchase price for the entrepreneurs’ company. On competing summary judgment motions, the New York Supreme Court – Commercial Division rejected the buyer’s claims (including claims for fraud, breach of contract, indemnification, and set-off) and granted the entrepreneurs’ affirmative claims for breach of the various promissory notes at issue. The New York Court also awarded attorney’s fees to the entrepreneurs.
Won a unanimous jury verdict of $1.3 million on behalf of two former partners of an accounting firm based on the accounting firm’s failure to pay amounts owed to the partners following their separation from the firm, including amounts owed to them for the repurchase of their shares of stock in the accounting firm. The jury also unanimously rejected a counterclaim filed by the accounting firm in which the firm sought more than $750,000 in damages based on alleged breaches of non-compete provisions, confidentiality provisions, and buy-sell provisions of the partners’ employment agreements which would have required the former partners to pay the firm for any clients that left with the former partners.
Successfully defended both a no-evidence and a traditional motion for summary judgment moving to dismiss all claims filed by a mixed-use real estate developer against its former joint-venture partner.
Represented real estate developer in dispute arising from the seller’s breach of a contract for the sale of real estate. The seller executed the contract for sale to the developer, but refused to close the sale, claiming the agent that brokered the deal did not have authority to negotiate on its behalf.
Obtained summary judgment in bill of review proceeding initiated to vacate default judgment in state district court, which had been rendered without proper service of process on non-resident defendant under the Texas long-arm statute.
Represented supplier of oilfield steel for use in the oil and gas industry in a lawsuit brought by a competitor alleging a former employee provided our client (his new employer) with confidential customer lists, vendor contact information and sales data owned by his former employer. Successfully obtained transfer of lawsuit from United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to the Southern District of Texas based on argument that Texas was a more convenient forum as the location of material events, the residence of defendants and most potential non-party witnesses, as well as the relative interests of justice.
Represented employees in lawsuits against former employers based on employer’s refusal to pay past due compensation or to honor obligations under employment agreements and/or severance agreements.
Obtained dismissal of an antitrust action in federal court in Arizona.
Won a summary judgment on behalf of a software utilities and management company and its chief executive officer on a breach of contract claim filed by two of the company’s former employees. The former employees claimed they were owed approximately $360,000 based on an amendment to an original purchase agreement regarding the sale of a software program. Summary judgment was awarded when it was shown that the amendment lacked material terms and was unenforceable as a matter of law. Following summary judgment, the former employees settled their remaining claims on very favorable terms for our clients.
Won a jury verdict for a homeowner against a designer she hired to provide interior design services. Although our client paid the designer for several decorative pieces, the designer failed to purchase the items and then refused to return our client’s money. The designer filed a counter-claim for the amount of money he alleged was still owed under the terms of the parties’ agreement. A unanimous jury rendered a verdict in favor of our client finding that the designer breached their agreement.
Obtained summary judgment from Supreme Court of the State of New York, Commercial Division, and affirmed by New York Appellate Division, First Department. Representing sellers of a valve distribution company in claims brought by the buyer for alleged damages and claims for indemnification based on the terms of the parties’ Stock Purchase Agreement. Sellers filed counterclaims for the amounts owed under the Stock Purchase Claims, as well as for fraud against the private equity firm that purchased the company and its principals.
Representing supplier of oilfield steel for use in the oil and gas industry in a lawsuit brought by a competitor alleging a former employee provided our client (his new employer) with confidential customer lists, vendor contact information and sales data owned by his former employer. Successfully obtained transfer of lawsuit from United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to the Southern District of Texas based on argument that Texas was a more convenient forum as the location of material events, the residence of defendants and most potential non-party witnesses, as well as the relative interests of justice.
Representing a world leader in premium insulation coatings against former employees and distributor for misappropriation of its confidential information and trade secrets. Successfully obtained a temporary injunction to prevent the use and/or disclose our client’s confidential insulating coating formulas and manufacturing processes.
Won partial summary judgment on behalf of restaurateurs on a breach of fiduciary duty/usurpation of a valuable partnership opportunity and oppression claim filed by restaurateurs’ partners. Also won a motion for partial summary judgment declaring a “Right to Participate” clause contained in the Partnership’s Operating Amendment invalid. Based on the alleged right to participate, the restaurateurs’ partners claimed to have an interest in a subsequent endeavor created and developed by the restaurateurs. Summary judgment was awarded when it was shown that the “Right to Participate” clause was invalid, and subsequently, the Court failed to find any breach of fiduciary duty or oppression on the part of the restaurateurs. Ultimately, this summary judgment led to a favorable settlement of the entire dispute for our clients.
Defended an LTE cellular network provider in a lawsuit by a California-based wireless broadband network component provider in an action for breach of a contract to purchase component parts necessary to build an LTE network in West Texas.
Represented individuals in disputes arising out of partnership agreements or other corporate entities, including limited liability companies and close corporations.
Represented a homeowner in a dispute against home builder for failure to timely complete construction and subsequent refusal to return Earnest Money, Change Order Funds and Good Faith Money.
Represented radio personalities in a lawsuit filed against them alleging breach of their affiliation and syndication agreements.
Represented a health care system in South Texas in a lawsuit against former insurance agents for violations of the Texas Insurance Code, violations of the Texas Theft Liability Act, conversion, fraud, fraud by non-disclosure, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract.
Represented employers in the defense of employment discrimination claims.
Represented commercial landlords and tenants in disputes involving non-payment of rent and other lease-related disputes.
Affirmed by the Fifth Circuit in a dispute involving opposing party’s attempt to compel arbitration.
Houstonia Magazine Names 12 BoyarMiller Attorneys to 2022-2023 Top Lawyers List
Eight BoyarMiller Shareholders Named in 2022 Texas Super Lawyers List
Houstonia Magazine Names 12 BoyarMiller Attorneys to 2021 Top Lawyers List
Seven BoyarMiller Shareholders Selected to 2021 Texas Super Lawyers List
BoyarMiller Names Andrew Pearce Chair of Litigation Group
BoyarMiller appoints Litigation Shareholder Andrew Pearce to Executive Committee
Clients Honor BoyarMiller in BTI Power Rankings 2017 Independent Report; Cites Firm as Having “Strongest Client Relationships” in Energy Industry, Again
BoyarMiller Wins Appeal That Advances Texas Law on Employee Non-compete and Trade Secret Claims
Texas Super Lawyers selects six BoyarMiller attorneys as 2017 Rising Stars
BTI Power Rankings 2016 Names BoyarMiller as a “go to” Firm for Clients in the Energy Industy
Strong Demand, Excess Capacity Fuels Uncertainty in Oil and Gas Industry Cites Expert Panel at BoyarMiller Energy Forum
BoyarMiller Announces Election of Two Shareholders
Texas Super Lawyers selects BoyarMiller attorneys as 2014 rising stars
BoyarMiller Promotes Two Attorneys To Senior Associate
Andrew Pearce Honored With Houston Bar Association President’s Award At Annual Dinner
South Texas College of Law Wins National Moot Court Competition
Andrew Pearce to Co-Chair Houston Bar Association Fun Run
Unanimous Jury Verdict in Contract and Non-Compete Case
5th Circuit Renders Unanimous Opinion In Favor Of BoyarMiller Clients
How are Rule 11 Agreements Enforced? The Devil is in the Details
What About Mediation? Four Reasons Worth Considering
What about Depositions? Three Tips to Prepare
What About Hiring a Lawyer?
What About Early Case Assessment?
How Will COVID-19 Impact Recovery of Damages in Civil Litigation?
Oil Is On the Move, and So Are Employees
The “Buc” stops here: the Fourteenth Court of Appeals explains why compensation re-payment provisions are unreasonable restraints of trade
“Conspiracy Theory”: Why two appellate justices asked the Supreme Court of Texas to clarify Texas law on civil conspiracy
Common Misconceptions About Enforcing Non-Competition Agreements in Texas (Part 2)
Common Misconceptions With Non-Compete Agreements in Texas (Part 1)
Non-party discovery in Texas: What should you do if you receive a discovery subpoena?
Forget About the “Best Defense” – Is the Truth a Valid Defense to Tortious Interference Claims in Texas?
Are Non-Competition Agreements for Sale?
Protect Yourself: Houston Downturn Means More Litigation
Be Careful What You Ask For: How a “Right to Reform” Clause in a Non-Compete Agreement Can Come Back to Bite You
This is Not an Exit: The Texas Supreme Court Puts the Kibosh on Judicially Mandated Buyouts in Shareholder Oppression Actions
The Fight Isn’t Over If You Ignore A Settlement’s Confidentiality Clause
If the Coca-Cola Formula is Not a Secret Anymore, What Is?
Facebook isn’t Just for Friend Requests: Texas Legislation Would Allow Service of Lawsuits through Social Media
All Hat, No Cattle: Bills Proposing Big Changes for Texas Courts May Start a Discussion, but have Little Chance of Becoming Reality
A Lesson from Howard Stern: Say What You Mean and Mean What You Say
Texas Governor Rick Perry Proposes “Loser Pays” Tort Reform, But Does Anyone Win?
When an In-House Counsel’s Bar Membership Goes Inactive, the Attorney-Client Privilege May Go With It
The Houston Lawyer: Recovery Stories
A Lesson in What Really Matters: Brittany Scheier
Smoke ‘Em If You Got ‘Em: The Legacy of Coach T. Gerald Treece
Where Do We Go from Here? Texas Law Schools Chart a Course
Privileges and Work Product: How to Get Information and How to Protect It
Why Doesn’t My Key Work? Landlord Commercial Lease Remedies: A Current View
Pick Your Headache: Non-Competes, Marijuana, or Interoffice Romances
Practical Advice on Escrow Disputes
Contractual Provisions: What Do They Really Mean and How Can They Work for You?
The Rules Have Changed: Recent Developments that Impact the Landscape of Business Litigation
The Before, During, and After of Non-Compete Agreements
To Shred or Not to Shred
The onset of litigation is like setting sail into the unknown, seeing the storm, bracing for turbulent seas.
You can trust your ship is in high command. BoyarMiller is an exceptional navigator; leading with great instincts, seasoned knowledge and cool confidence.
At the end of your journey, I am sure, you will call your Captain, friend.
Andrew Pearce has provided litigation services for restaurant concepts Hopdoddy Burger Bar and Moonshine Patio Bar & Grill.